Boxmining v2

Tag: FTX

  • Genesis Trading Insolvency Could Trigger a Bitcoin Collapse

    Genesis Trading Insolvency Could Trigger a Bitcoin Collapse

    What’s Happening with Genesis Trading?

    Genesis Trading is one of the world’s largest crypto trading desks for professional investors, primarily offering Bitcoin over-the-counter (OTC) trades and lending services. Recently, Genesis has temporarily suspended redemptions and new loan originations due to abnormal withdrawal requests in the aftermath of the collapse of FTX.

    Genesis stated that the withdrawal requests have exceeded its current liquidity, which raised concerns about the firm going insolvent. Because Genesis is directly affiliated with some of the largest crypto institutions, its fall could start another domino effect that is even more devastating than the FTX contagion.

    In case you are out of the loop, we have covered the entire timeline of the FTX contagion in chronological order listed down below:

    Fallback of Genesis Trading from Three Arrows Capital

    The lack of liquidity Genesis is undergoing is not only because of FTX. It is largely attributed to the fall of Three Arrows Capital (3AC) in the aftermath of the Terra Luna collapse.

    Genesis was the biggest creditor to 3AC, lending $2.4 billion. After 3AC went bankrupt, Genesis filed a $1.2 billion claim against them. When 3AC failed to provide the required collateral, the parent company of Genesis, Digital Currency Group (DCG), stepped in and assumed the $1.2 billion claim, leaving Genesis with no outstanding liabilities to 3AC.

    By Q3 2022, their market activity drastically fell, with loan originations falling from $50 billion in Q4 2021 to a mere $8.4 billion. Despite the situation, institutional investors still believe they were crypto’s safest counter-party.

    Gemini’s Exposure to Genesis Trading

    Gemini, one of the top crypto exchanges regulated in the U.S., announced that there would be withdrawal delays with its Earn product, in which Genesis is a lending partner. If you do not know how Genesis ties into Gemini Earn, here’s how it basically works:

    After the lenders give their crypto to Gemini, it will be given to Genesis for them to lend out to a fund. The borrowing party will pay fees for this, which will be shared between Gemini and the lenders. The problem now is that Genesis is having liquidity issues, thus they are unable to give Gemini back their crypto. This means that lenders on Gemini Earn cannot get their crypto back.

    Although Gemini assures this does not impact any other products and services, Gemini customers are rushing to get their funds out fearing the exchange is next to go down as the FTX contagion spreads. Over the past 24 hours at the time of writing, Gemini has seen $570 million in withdrawals and ETH withdrawals reached an all-time high on the exchange.

    Genesis Trading’s Impact on the Crypto Market

    It is not just Gemini but also many other CeFi platforms and major hedge funds use Genesis for their yield product. Moreover, many crypto whales opt to give their funds directly to Genesis to earn yields as well as custodial services. If Genesis is unable to give them back their crypto, many lenders worldwide could potentially lose their asset.

    Genesis is also a sister company of Grayscale, the world’s largest Bitcoin fund (GBTC) and one of the largest Bitcoin holders worth $11 billion at the time of writing. If Grayscale is affected by this, there is a possibility that Grayscale will dissolve GBTC to pay back lenders. This impact of this could be huge.

    However, Grayscale assured users that Genesis is not a counterparty or service provider for any Grayscale product, which means they will not be affected by Genesis suspending withdrawals. But in light of recent situations where FTX and Alameda claimed that they are two independent entities, sceptics are demanding a full audit to prove customer funds are safe.

    Genesis Trading Lays Off 30% of Workforce

    On 5th January 2023, Genesis Trading announced a large-scale layoff in order to reduce cost. According to sources close to the matter quoted by Coindesk, 30% of its workforce were cut, which especially affected the sales and business development departments. In addition to Genesis previously slashing 20% of its workforce in August, the company now has around 145 employees.

    The layoff follows shortly after Genesis Interim CEO Derar Islim sent a letter to clients on January 4, addressing the fact that the firm needs more time to sort out its financial issues. However, time is not something Genesis can afford as it faces increasing pressure from creditors.

    Genesis currently owes $900 million to Gemini, and is due to come up with a solution by 8th January 2023. Gemini co-founder Cameron Winklevoss believes that DCG is to blame and should be held responsible for its subsidiary company’s situation. In an open letter to DCG CEO Barry Silbert, Winklevoss accused him of “bad faith stall tactics” and claimed that a $1.675 billion loan from Genesis to DCG is the reason why Genesis is facing liquidity issues.

    Genesis Trading Considers Bankruptcy

    According to Wall Street Journal, Genesis hired investment bank Moelis & Company to review Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings. A Genesis spokesperson explained that it is to “preserve customer assets and drive the business forward.”

    As of 19th January 2023, Genesis is laying the groundwork for a bankruptcy filing, according to Bloomberg. Reports indicated that Genesis is in confidential negotiations with various creditor groups in an attempt to raise cash. However, if Genesis fails to raise capital, it is highly likely they will file for bankruptcy.

    Digital Currency Group (DCG) Under Severe Pressure Amid Genesis Crisis

    On 17th January 2023, DCG halted dividend payments to preserve cash. According to a letter to DCG shareholders reported by Bloomberg, DCG is focusing on strengthening their balance sheet by reducing operating expenses and preserving liquidity. As the parent company of Genesis, this move is most likely the result of the financial crisis Genesis is facing.

    Moreover, CoinDesk, whose parent company is DCG, is hiring advisors at investment bank Lazard to explore options for a potential sale, including a partial or full sale of the company. According to Wall Street Journal, CoinDesk has actually been privately seeking a deal for months, and has received numerous offers. Whether this is related to the Genesis and DCG crisis, no parties have responded to requests for comment.

    CONFIRMED: Genesis Trading Filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection

    According to latest news by CNBC, Genesis Trading filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection late Thursday night in Manhattan federal court. Over 100,000 creditors were listed in the company’s bankruptcy filing, with aggregate liabilities ranging from a whopping $1.2 billion to $11 billion.

    In its filing, Genesis stated that it anticipates that after the restructuring process, there will be funds available to pay off unsecured creditors – a group that can be completely eliminated in bankruptcy cases if the circumstances are particularly dire. They also noted the bankruptcy only affects its lending business, and that its derivatives and spot trading business will continue unhindered.

  • FTX Victims Must Read: US Government to Help Recover Lost Funds?

    FTX Victims Must Read: US Government to Help Recover Lost Funds?

    ​​U.S. Government Launches Website for Victims of FTX Collapse

    The U.S. government has launched a website for victims of the FTX collapse to communicate with law enforcement in regards to former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried’s “alleged” fraud. In an order late Friday night, U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan in Manhattan authorized federal prosecutors to use the website to speed up the process given the massive scale of the FTX collapse.

    FTX owes money to at least 1 million people including creditors and customers. This would help prosecutors with their case immensely as it is ‘”impractical” to contact each victim individually and get their testimony, the prosecutors remarked in the court filing.

    Federal Law Requires Prosecutors to Contact FTX Victims

    Federal law requires prosecutors to contact possible crime victims to inform them of their rights, including the rights to obtain restitution, be heard in court and be protected from defendants. “If you believe that you may have been a victim of fraud by Samuel Bankman-Fried, A/K/A/ ‘SBF,’ please contact the victim/witness coordinator at the United States Attorney’s office using the email address listed below for assistance in verifying whether you are a victim in this case,” stated in the website.

    In criminal cases, prosecutors are required to notify victims ahead of plea or sentencing proceedings and allow them enough time to give testimony if they want to be heard. Based on the number of victims who provide such notice, the court will rule on the manner in which victims will be heard at such proceedings,” Kaplan wrote in his court order.

    FTX Victim Testimonies Strengthen Arguments

    Recently, Bankman-Fried has pleaded not guilty to eight counts of wire fraud and conspiracy over the FTX collapse. Prosecutors have said he stole billions in customer deposits to pay debts for his hedge fund, Alameda Research, and lied to investors about the exchange’s financial condition.

    Though Bankman-Fried has acknowledged risk management shortcomings, he did not consider himself criminally liable. In such a case, the direct evidence regarding the case may not be enough, hence testimonies of the victims can greatly strengthen arguments. Moreover, for the many other victims who did not come forward to cite legal trouble or other factors, this website could help them take the first step to recover their funds, and build a stronger and more compelling case with their testimonies, given the massive scale of damage Bankman-Fried has done.

    FTX Owes Money to Over 1 Million People

    The US Attorney suggests more indictments to follow. According to FTX’s bankruptcy filing on November 11, it owes money to more than 100,000 creditors and at least 1 million affected FTX and FTX US users.

    John Ray, currently CEO of FTX, testified at the U.S. House Financial Services Committee in December, asserting that his team is implementing a restructuring plan that will potentially help customers and creditors get their money back.

    One of the core objectives is asset protection and recovery. It involves extensive tracing of money flows and asset transfers from the time of FTX’s founding. Ray said that they are in the process of “collecting and reviewing dozens of terabytes of documents and data, including records of billions of individual transactions.”

    U.S. Customers Accounted for 2% of All FTX Traffic

    In an analysis of monthly active user data by CoinGecko, customers in the U.S. accounted for 2% of all traffic. Ray mentioned in his testimony that there were 2.7 million users in FTX US and 7.6 million users in FTX. But since “a small number of U.S. customers” were also among the FTX users, he overstates the actual customer relationships due to the possibility a customer may have more than one account.

    Therefore, Ray aims to get to the bottom of the actual customer numbers. And the website for FTX victims can help speed up the process by providing information and clarity, since it is unlikely that most customers will not be able to appear at the Manhattan court in person.

  • Bitcoin Price Dips After Fed’s December Meeting Minutes Release

    Bitcoin Price Dips After Fed’s December Meeting Minutes Release

    The Federal Reserve’s December meeting minutes revealed the central bank’s plans to continue raising the federal funds rate to control rising inflation. This could potentially impact the crypto market as economic activity is further tightened, signalling consumers and investors to save money and mitigate risk. Shortly after the news, the price of Bitcoin and Ethereum had dropped momentarily before bouncing back to the $16800 and $1250 range respectively.

    Key Takeaways:

    • Feds opted to raise interest rates by 50 basis points, putting the target range for federal funds rate to 4.25%-4.5%.
    • The new restrictive policy in place will fight inflation, but it also tightens economic activity including investments in the crypto market.
    • The price of Bitcoin and Ethereum dropped 1% after the Federal Reserve’s December meeting minutes were released.
    • The Fed’s minutes noted the collapse of digital asset exchange FTX, but said it didn’t have a serious effect on the wider financial system.

    Fed Signals Hawkish Interest Hikes in 2023

    The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) and Federal Reserve officials concluded its December 13-14 meeting, publishing new projections for expected inflation in 2023 which is higher than previously anticipated. Against the macro backdrop, Fed officials agreed to raise interest rates by 50 basis points, putting the target range for the federal funds rate to 4.25%-4.5%.

    Higher interest rates mean higher borrowing costs, which in turn affects consumer spending and investments in speculative markets including the stock market and crypto market. The news of the Fed’s plans to continue raising interest rates has caused investors to be cautious, as they are wary of its potential impact on the crypto market. Occasions such as this would prompt traders and investors to sell U.S. equities as well as Bitcoin and other digital assets to mitigate risk.

    This caused the price of Bitcoin to dip nearly 1%. Ethereum, the second largest digital asset by market cap, also dropped by 1%. According to Cryptowatch, the correlation between Bitcoin and Ethereum sits strong at 0.82. Therefore, it is expected that Ethereum will mirror Bitcoin’s price movement.

    Despite the dip, Bitcoin is still up 0.4% in the past 24 hours and 1.2% in the past week. Ethereum is down 0.1% at the time of writing but has seen 5.1% gains in the past week.

    Fed officials also noted the collapse of FTX, acknowledging its impact on the crypto ecosystem. However, they claimed that the situation did not have a serious effect on the wider financial system. The meeting summary stated, “while the spillovers from this situation had been significant among other crypto lenders and exchanges, the collapse was not seen as posing broader market risks to the financial system. (Valium) ”

  • 2022 Crypto Recap: The Good, The Bad, and The Uglies

    2022 Crypto Recap: The Good, The Bad, and The Uglies

    The crypto industry had a tumultuous year in 2022, with coins tanking at the start of Q2 and never rallying, signalling the beginning of a crypto winter. To make matters worse, the collapse of Terra Luna and FTX led to a devastating contagion across the industry. Despite the challenges, we shouldn’t forget about the progress and achievements the industry has made. Here’s a brief recap of some of the biggest news in 2022.

    Crypto’s Role in the Russia-Ukraine War (February)

    During the Russia-Ukraine war, cryptocurrencies have been immensely valuable to Ukrainian refugees. Russian attacks have destroyed critical infrastructure, rendering many Ukrainians inaccessible to withdrawing money from ATM machines. Therefore, many Ukrainian refugees relied on digital currencies sent from relatives or donors abroad to purchase goods and services.

    All that is needed for them to access their cryptocurrency wallets is a mobile phone and internet access, which was being provided by the thousands of Starlink satellite internet dishes provided by Elon Musk’s SpaceX at the time.

    Feds Interest Rate Hike (March)

    Despite Bitcoin reaching an all-time high of $69000+ in November 2021, what follows is a series of market decline. This is in part due to the U.S. Federal Reserve announcing its first interest rate hike in March to fight increasing inflation. As a result, the macro backdrop began to worsen, not only affecting crypto assets but also every other investment asset class. This also called into question Bitcoin’s reputation as an inflation hedge as Bitcoin itself started to trade in tandem with Nasdaq tech stocks, according to the New York Times.

    Collapse of Terra Luna (May-July)

    The collapse of the Terra Luna ecosystem in May 2022 was one of the most devastating black swan events in crypto history, wiping at least $60 billion off the market which triggered a dangerous domino effect across the industry such as the fall of several high-profile crypto firms, namely Three Arrows Capital, Voyager Digital, and Celsius Network.

    Amid the crash, the UST algorithmic stablecoin, which was supposed to maintain a $1 peg via on-chain mechanisms with Terra’s native token LUNA, depegged, bottoming out at $0.006. This was caused by a massive continuous selloff on both UST and LUNA, resulting in a death spiral. Terraform Labs (TFL) developers and founder Do Kwon are facing multiple investigations as well as lawsuits into its collapse. (Canadian Pharmacy) As of now, South Korean authorities and Interpol have issued a warrant for the search and arrest of Do Kwon and his accomplices.

    Recovery Plan of Terra Luna Classic (August)

    As of now, the Luna Classic blockchain is managed and governed by the community after Terraform Labs (TFL) developers abandoned the chain in support of Luna 2.0. On August 26th 2022, governance was restored as citizens of Luna Classic could delegate, stake, and vote for the future of the ecosystem. Proposals and the associated implementations are being passed by the Terra Classic Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO).

    Feds Sanction Tornado Cash (August)

    On 8th August 2022, the U.S. Treasury Department imposed sanctions against Tornado Cash, a privacy-focused Ethereum mixing service that obscures the trail back to the fund’s original source. They claimed that Lazarus Group, a cybercrime group run by the North Korean government, has been using Tornado Cash to launder illicit funds.

    Moreover, one of the developers for Tornado Cash was arrested in the Netherlands. The crypto community and privacy advocates bashed Netherlands authorities as the developer was simply writing code and had nothing to do with illicit activities. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin also criticized the move as he himself used Tornado Cash to make donations to Ukraine’s cause.

    Ethereum Merge (September)

    On 15th September 2022 at 06:42:42 UTC at block 15537393, the Ethereum Merge was completed. This meant a merger of the Ethereum mainnet execution layer and the Beacon Chain’s consensus layer, transitioning from the proof-of-work consensus mechanism to proof-of-stake. This landmark update brings major changes to the network, including a 99.95% reduction in energy consumption and a 90% cut in ETH issuance.

    This is a significant achievement in the history of blockchain, allowing the Ethereum network to scale effectively as demand for Web3 and DeFi increase. Since Ethereum is the mother of all smart contract platforms, this could put Ethereum in a position to rival Bitcoin in adoption and even value.

    Downfall of FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried (November)

    On 11th November 2022, former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) filed FTX, FTX US, and Alameda Research for bankruptcy in the U.S. Once hailed as one of the top crypto exchanges, the sudden collapse of FTX came as a shocking blow to the entire crypto industry, setting off yet another contagion across the space. This affected 130 affiliated companies including several high-profile firms such as BlockFi, Genesis Trading, Grayscale, KuCoin, Gemini, Coinbase, Crypto.com, Sequoia Capital, and Galaxy Digital.

    Apparently, SBF was misappropriating customer funds for his own benefits without customers’ consent and knowledge, conducting unethical flywheel schemes with Alameda Research. As a result, SBF had been arrested in the Bahamas, facing many criminal charges including securities fraud, money laundering, and campaign finance law violations. However, on 22nd Decemeber 2022, the disgraced FTX founder was released on a $250 million bail.

  • Binance vs FTX Exchange Comparison Overview: Which is the Better Exchange?

    Binance vs FTX Exchange Comparison Overview: Which is the Better Exchange?

    Which Cryptocurrency Exchange is the “Best”?

    There is a lot to consider when it comes to cryptocurrency investment and trading, and crypto exchanges are a great way to start. It is a good platform for beginners to familiarize themselves with the market as well as for experienced traders to make use of the various products the exchanges offer.

    There are hundreds of crypto exchanges, and everyone is asking. “which crypto exchange is the best?” Everyone wants to get the best bang for their buck, whether it be low trading fees or lucrative products. We will be comparing two of the top and most talked about crypto exchanges in the world: Binance and FTX Exchange.

    FTX EXCHANGE (INCLUDING FTX INTERNATIONAL AND FTX.US) ARE NO LONGER IN OPERATION

    Both exchanges have filed for bankruptcy. Subsequently, the exchange was “hacked” and more than US$600 million worth of cryptocurrencies drained. The hacker is strongly rumoured to be a former FTX employee. For more about how this story unfolded and the latest news, check out these articles:

    What is FTX Exchange?

    Founded in 2019, FTX Exchange is a cryptocurrency trading platform that was built by Alameda Research, a quantitative trading firm that develops specialized algorithms for trading crypto. It has topped many trading charts by volume and is responsible for 30% of the market trading volume on major exchanges.

    The strong trading background of FTX shows that they live up to their claim of being an exchange “built by traders, for traders.”

    FTX is largely focused on the derivative and prediction market, offering a wide array of futures, options, and volatility products with competitive trading rates and discounts for specific users.

    FTX Exchange has been growing significantly over the past year, exploding past the likes of KuCoin and Kraken. They even managed to take market share away from Coinbase as well, which is the number one crypto exchange in the U.S. This is in part thanks to huge venture capital funding that is backing FTX.

    Check out FTX Exchange Guide for a full review and tutorial on how to use FTX Exchange. 

    What is Binance Exchange?

    Binance was founded in 2017 by Chengpeng Zhao (CZ), former Chief Technology Officer of OKCoin who has years of experience developing high-frequency trading software.

    Binance is, by a large margin, the world’s most popular cryptocurrency exchange. It has more than than $25 billion in organic trading volume per day and millions of users worldwide.

    Binance is largely focused on the spot market and has one of the most cryptocurrencies available to trade. It also has powerful trading tools such as leveraged trading, options trading and lending platform.

    For the longest time, the trading platform scene is dominated by Binance, and is held in high regard for being smart and proactive in their planning and actions, not only for themselves but also for developing the crypto industry as a whole.

    Binance has been highly active in collaborating with international regulators to support the development of a regulatory framework and policies for cryptocurrencies. In 2022, Binance as well as FTX has received regulatory approval to set up shop in Dubai and Bahrain.

    This is a significant step since it enables both exchanges to function in accordance with international standards, and meet the criteria of major regulators like the Financial Action Task Force.

    Binance vs FTX Exchange Overview

    In this section, we will take a closer look at what Binance and FTX have to offer and compare them based on these features:

    • Products
    • Supported cryptocurrencies
    • Fees
    • Security

    Products

    Binance and FTX have quite a lot of similarities based on their general offering. But the major difference is that Binance is more focused on the spot market and has more cryptocurrencies to offer, whereas FTX is more focused on the derivative and prediction market and has more volatility products. Therefore, FTX is usually seen as the preferred choice for experienced traders who want a wider (and potentially higher risk/reward) range of products.

    Both exchanges offer products that are exclusive to them. Binance offers Crypto Loans, a P2P market, and Binance Earn, while FTX offers volatility and prediction markets. The addition of FTX stocks makes it the first domestic crypto exchange to provide stocks on its platform, enabling trading of stocks and ETFs by U.S. users.

    FTX’s crypto card is exclusively accessible to US residents via the FTX US platform, whereas Binance’s crypto debit card has gained enormous popularity. While FTX places a greater emphasis on specialized trading products, Binance has more to offer in terms of their Binance Earn, allowing users to earn passive income.

    Both Binance and FTX offers a mobile app for iPhone and Android so users can trade cryptocurrencies on the go.

    Supported cryptocurrencies

    Binance has the highest number of cryptocurrencies that any exchange offers to its users. It currently has 1,300 cryptocurrencies including its own native crypto, Binance Coin (BNB).

    Learn more about Binance Coin (BNB).

    Nevertheless, FTX offers a lot of cryptocurrencies for users to trade, though not as large as Binance’s. FTX supports over 460 cryptocurrencies including its own native crypto, FTX Token (FTT).

    Both exchanges however, are consistently adding to their lists of supported cryptocurrencies, including newly launched tokens.

    Fees

    The rates on both exchanges’ spot trade markets are extremely low, and they continue to decline as volume rises. However, FTX wins out since it assesses 0.02% as a maker fee and 0.07% as a taker fee for tier one accounts.

    This is significantly lower than Binance fees, i.e. 0.1% maker and taker fee. Even after using BNB for trading fees, the user will have to pay a 0.075% fee, which is higher than FTX.

    We can see that FTX is better for trading, and is clearly a winner in this category.

    Security

    One of the most important considerations when choosing an exchange is security. It’s safe to say that Binance and FTX are two of the most secure exchanges in the world.

    Both exchanges use two factor authentication, and they store account funds and data away from online platforms so that they cannot be hacked. They also insure their funds by putting a certain amount of fee away as an insurance fraud.

    Both platforms also employ round-the-clock monitoring and analysis, and in the case of a theft, user funds are protected by the reserves that both firms have in their treasuries.

    FTX is one of the few exchanges that have never been hacked, and while Binance has seen some hacking incidents in the past, both exchanges adhere to the strictest industry security guidelines, with the majority of funds being kept in cold storage. FTX also does third party transaction audits via Chainalysis, giving them a slight edge over Binance.

    However, we must also consider the fact that Binance has been around longer and has a much larger trading volume than FTX, making them a more attractive target to hackers. But Binance has managed to hold their ground and plan for the worst, and is still one of the top performing exchanges despite the bear market.

    Conclusion

    Binance and FTX have quite a lot of similarities based on their general offering. But the major difference is that Binance is more focused on the spot market and has more cryptocurrencies to offer, whereas FTX is more focused on the derivative and prediction market and has more volatility products.

    Binance offers the most cryptocurrencies to trade including new projects such as DeFi, NFT or metaverse gaming. If you are a beginner or looking for new tokens to trade, or even an experienced investor who prefers passive earnings, Binance would be a better option for you.

    If you are an experienced trader who strictly does day trading or skilled at volatility products, FTX would be the go-to for you as it offers all the products traders need, with significantly low fees.

    Disclaimer: Cryptocurrency trading involves significant risks and may result in the loss of your capital. You should carefully consider whether trading cryptocurrencies is right for you in light of your financial condition and ability to bear financial risks. Cryptocurrency prices are highly volatile and can fluctuate widely in a short period of time. As such, trading cryptocurrencies may not be suitable for everyone. Additionally, storing cryptocurrencies on a centralized exchange carries inherent risks, including the potential for loss due to hacking, exchange collapse, or other security breaches. We strongly advise that you seek independent professional advice before engaging in any cryptocurrency trading activities and carefully consider the security measures in place when choosing or storing your cryptocurrencies on a cryptocurrency exchange.

  • Binance Steps Up Regulatory Efforts in the U.S.

    Binance Steps Up Regulatory Efforts in the U.S.

    Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume, has joined the Chamber of Digital Commerce, an American lobbying group, to help establish crypto regulation in the United States. The Chamber of Digital Commerce is a leading blockchain and crypto trade association with members such as Citi, Visa, MasterCard, Dapper Labs, Ripple, and Circle.

    This move comes as U.S. lawmakers are moving aggressively towards regulating the crypto space as result of FTX’s collapse in November as well as the Terra Luna collapse in May. Billions of dollars’ worth of crypto assets were stolen and lost, prompting politicians and regulators in the U.S. to take strict action.

    It is without a doubt that Binance also played a key part in the collapse of FTX. After Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) learned of the unethical flywheel scheme that Alameda Research and FTX were taking part in, he announced on Twitter that he would liquidate all of Binance’s FTT holdings, FTX’s native token.

    Shortly afterwards, as investors got hold of the news, they quickly rushed to withdraw their assets, leading to a liquidity crunch in FTX. CZ then announced that Binance had signed a non-binding letter of intent to acquire FTX to help and protect customers, but pulled out the next day after realizing the massive hole in FTX’s balance sheets.

    Despite CZ’s efforts to protect the crypto industry, some believed that Binance is to blame. Former FTX spokesman Kevin O’Leary testified at the Senate Banking Committee hearing, saying that Binance “intentionally put FTX out of business”, even though FTX was already engaging in illegal activities. Regardless, lawmakers and regulators began diverting their attention to Binance.

    According to Reuters, U.S. authorities are currently considering filing criminal charges against top executives of Binance including CZ, relating to money laundering allegations in 2018. However, Binance defended against Reuters, saying that they are attacking Binance’s law enforcement team who have strictly complied with anti-money laundering policies.

    As of now, the U.S. Department of Justice is still divided over whether to prosecute Binance. It is unclear whether they will pursue this four-year long case. Given the circumstances, Binance’s decision to join the Chamber of Digital Commerce is an effort to help establish policies that benefit and protect users, and to provide education and advocacy on the use of digital assets and blockchain-based technologies.

    Binance’s Vice President of Public Affairs Joanne Kubba said that “working hand in glove with policymakers, regulatory bodies, and industry groups like the Chamber is imperative for Binance.”

  • Silvergate Capital’s Exposure to FTX Collapse: What Investors Need to Know

    Silvergate Capital’s Exposure to FTX Collapse: What Investors Need to Know

    Silvergate Capital, one of the leading banks for Fintech businesses and cryptocurrency, is facing a number of risks as a result of their exposure to FTX’s collapse. As a publicly traded financial service company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), Wall Street banks including Morgan Stanley are strongly advising investors to sell Silvergate stocks due to its affiliation with FTX. Because Silvergate positions itself as the main pipeline facilitating the flow of fiat funds and fiat onramps between large crypto exchanges, its impact on the crypto market is comparable to Genesis Trading if they went under.

    Silvergate Capital Exposure to FTX is $1.1 billion

    Following the collapse of FTX, Silvergate Capital disclosed details of their relationship with FTX and Alameda Research. Although Silvergate does not appear to be a creditor to FTX, they had a sizeable deposit relationship with the exchange, which accounted for nearly 10% of its $11.9 billion in deposits from digital asset customers.

    Silvergate claimed its exposure is “minimal” but $1.1 billion is still a lot of money. As a result, investors have begun to fear the crypto bank is developing the same symptoms as other troubled institutions who have fallen to the contagion. Short sellers have already taken their short position on Silvergate, with the stock now down 53% over the past month.

    Silvergate Capital CEO Addresses Market Concerns

    In response to speculations of market uncertainty, Silvergate Capital CEO Alan Lane asserted that the company followed all relevant regulatory procedures when receiving wires directed to Alameda Research, implementing risk management policies to ensure the security of customer funds. He also noted that the bank has a strong balance sheet and ample liquidity, with cash and securities in excess of its digital asset related deposit liabilities.

    If we are taking Lane’s word for it, FTX’s collapse will have little effect on Silvergate. However, the broader market downturn could cause the bank’s foundation to crack if other large depositors continue struggling. Moreover, though Lane claimed they conducted “extensive due diligence” on the FTX group, the community is pointing out its contradiction as they would have prevented it in the first place if they had really done due diligence.

    Morgan Stanley Downgrades Silvergate Shares

    In a Monday letter to investors, Morgan Stanley lowered its rating on Silvergate’s shares from equal weight to underweight, recommending investors to reduce their exposure to Silvergate stocks. This came across when Silvergate’s digital deposits are down 60% in Q4, citing its need to fund outflows with securities sales and costly wholesale borrowing. With clients withdrawing their deposits, the company is facing even more pressure on its net interest margins (NIM) and net interest income (NII).

    Despite Silvergate facing uncertainty in the near-term, the bank has been around since 1988 with a long history of robust financial performances and regulatory experience. Their tier 1 leverage ratio, which measures a bank’s ability to withstand financial stress, was 10.7% in Q3, making them among the top 15% of American banks by this critical metric.

    Its long-established regulatory compliance and healthy leverage ratio are set up to weather any financial storm. However, since the crypto industry is still largely unregulated and highly volatile, as well as the downfall of several financial heavyweights, only time will tell if Silvergate will survive this crisis.

  • Will DEXs Take Over Centralized Exchanges after FTX Collapse?

    Will DEXs Take Over Centralized Exchanges after FTX Collapse?

    “Not your keys, not your crypto” — this decade-old mantra has taken full effect after the FTX collapse. Crypto users have lost faith in centralized exchanges (CEXs) and are migrating to decentralized exchanges (DEXs) instead. Though a non-custodial option seem to be an ideal solution, it would likely take a long time until price discovery shifts from centralized to decentralized platforms. Let’s take a closer look.

    Impact of FTX Collapse on Centralized Exchanges

    Almost every centralized platform in the crypto industry had done business with FTX, and some companies bore the brunt of the collapse such as BlockFi, Genesis Trading, and KuCoin. Crypto users around the globe found they could no longer withdraw assets from several crypto exchanges as the contagion spreads.

    FTX’s collapse is a symptom of a problem inherent to centralized exchanges, also known as custodial exchanges. Customers’ tokens parked on the platform are exposed to the risk the exchange could go bust. Because crypto has no government depositary schemes to cover losses, customers of insolvent exchanges must wait for bankruptcy courts to regain what remains of their funds — if there is any left after other investors claim their share.

    Given the circumstances, all crypto exchanges including Binance have been implementing proof-of-reserves to verify they have enough assets to cover all customers’ funds. Though it is a good transparency initiative, investors still fear for the safety of their funds. As a result, many CEX customers rushed to withdraw their funds, opting for non-custodial solutions. This is where DEXs come in.

    Rise of Decentralized Exchanges after FTX Collapse

    Soon after FTX’s downfall, decentralized exchanges saw a vertical spike in trading volume. According to DeFi Llama, the monthly DEX volume showed an increase of 80% from $57.6 billion in October to $103.8 in November. At the time of writing, Uniswap had the largest trading volume with 60%, followed by Curve (9.6%), PancakeSwap (9%), DODO Exchange (8%), and Balancer (3%).

    Monthly DEX Trading Volume (Source: DeFi Llama)

    Moreover, Uniswap also surpassed Coinbase in daily ETH trading volume on November 14 ($1.1 billion vs $600 million). This is significant as CEXs have always been dominant in trading large market cap coins given their deep liquidity. It strongly indicates traders are moving away from CEXs.

    This is compounded by the fact that Bitcoin (BTC) has been exiting CEX wallets at a record pace. According to on-chain data analytics Glassnode, BTC withdrawals from CEX to self-custody wallets is unfolding at a historic rate of 106k BTC monthly. This accounts for $3.7 billion worth of Bitcoins over the past week. Simultaneously, hardware wallet providers such as Ledger and Trezor reported its highest sales day. Check out some of these wallets:

    Advantages of Decentralized Exchanges

    Decentralized exchanges, also known as non-custodial exchanges, are decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols that allow users to trade directly with other users via smart contracts, without handing over management of their funds to an intermediary or custodian.

    They are non-custodial, which means users have full and exclusive control of their wallet’s private keys. This is the opposite of putting your assets on CEXs as they hold onto the wallets and keys on your behalf. This feature makes it impossible for centralized players to siphon user funds, and is why people are doing their trading on DEXs instead.

    Transactions on DEXs are facilitated through the use of smart contracts, and liquidity pools are funded by other users. As such, there is significantly reduced counterparty risk — you do not need to trust other users, only the code. There are three types of DEXs that uses different protocols: automated market makers (AMM), order book DEXs, and DEX aggregators. But they are all programmed to determine the best price for an asset, all while offering a better rate for users compared to CEXs.

    Moreover, anyone can earn passive income if they provide liquidity to the protocol. On the other hand, CEXs are managed by a centralized organization such as a bank or a small handful of professional trading firms or market makers. In this case, since liquidity is concentrated in these actors, CEX maker and taker fees are much higher than DEX swap fees. Additionally, they can also choose to withdraw their assets during periods of volatility, restricting trades when users need it most.

    Challenges Facing Decentralized Exchanges

    Despite the many critical advantages DEXs offer, it has several downsides that hinders widespread adoption:

    Relies Heavily on Centralized Exchanges

    Most DEXs are dependent on price oracles (i.e. Chainlink) that source data from CEXs. As such, an attacker can manipulate the price of an asset on a particular DEX, leading to inaccurate price data being fed to all protocols which rely on that DEX as a price oracle.

    A flash loan attack is a common method to trick price oracles. In such events, attackers essentially create false arbitrage opportunities by instantaneously borrowing, swapping, depositing large numbers of tokens, tricking price oracles that the target token’s price is being moved on a single exchange.

    This creates a disparity which can then be arbitraged, allowing the sale or purchase of assets at above or below market price. Polygon’s Quickswap was a victim of this attack in October 2022.

    DEX Transactions are Slower than CEX

    Trading on DEXs are often much slower because all trades take place on the blockchain. It takes time for blocks to be validated and transactions to go through. On the other hand, CEX trades are almost instantaneous because they take place on proprietary matching engines instead of the blockchain. These engines are complex software that synchronizes and combines data from thousands of trading pairs at the same time.

    Liquidity Issues and Impermanent Loss

    DEXs cannot yet compete with large CEXs in size as they cannot offer as much liquidity. When they do not have enough liquidity, large orders can incur slippages in which the buyer pays above-market prices on their order. As such, a lack of liquidity can deter institutional participation as large orders are likely to suffer from slippage.

    On another note, liquidity providers are exposed to a risk of impermanent loss when depositing two assets for a specific trading pair. In most cases, liquidity providers end up withdrawing more of the token that lost value and less of the one that gained value because the ratio of tokens held in the pool changes as trades occur.

    Smart Contract Vulnerabilities

    Although there is significantly reduced counterparty risk when using DEXs, there is still the issue of smart contract vulnerabilities that can be exploited by hackers. Smart contract codes are publicly available and anyone can review their code. Therefore, exploitable bugs can still slip past audits and other code reviews.

    This is a problem inherent to all DeFi protocols. Over the past two years, we have seen numerous hacks on cross-chain bridges, hot wallets, staking platforms, and even entire blockchain infrastructures.

    See also: 10 Best Smart Contract Security Auditing Firms in 2022

    Future Landscape of Crypto Exchanges

    In the wake of FTX’s collapse, users’ confidence in centralized exchanges are waning and the crypto community expects a shift toward decentralized platforms. However, according to JPMorgan and several other financial analysts, centralized exchanges will continue to control the majority of global digital-asset trading volumes. Although DEX trading volume has surged over the past month, it is a possibility that it reflects the automatic liquidations following the FTX collapse, and does not indicate the start of a long-term trend.

    DEX users are still confined to a relatively small base of niche traders and investors, and their interfaces can be difficult to navigate. At this stage, CEXs still provide a better user experience, fiat gateways, and deeper liquidity. To date, Uniswap has a total of 4.5 million users cumulatively, whereas Coinbase has a total verified user base of 108 million.

    With that being said, DeFi is still in its infancy. Development in liquidity protocols, safekeeping mechanisms, and user interfaces is needed to fully realize the potential of non-custodial trading services. As long as DEXs can compete with CEXs in terms of liquidity and speed, we may start to see widespread adoption or even a full-on switch to DEXs. After all, decentralized infrastructures are key to preventing centralized collapses, something we, as the community, has had enough of for the past year.

  • What will happen to BlockFi?

    What will happen to BlockFi?

    BlockFi is a company that specialises in providing cryptocurrency lending services to clients worldwide. In our previous article, we reported that since 11th November 2022, BlockFi has paused its client withdrawals. Their reason for this was because of the “lack of clarity” in the status of FTX.com, FTX US and Alameda. Now the question is, what will happen to BlockFi? Will they also go bankrupt like FTX?

    What is BlockFi?

    BlockFi was founded in 2017 by Zac Prince and Flori Marquez. The aim of BlockFi was to create credit services for those with limited access to simple financial products. Their financial products included borrowing using crypto as collateral, the ability to earn crypto interest rates, and trading, among others.

    BlockFi prides itself as the only independent lender and is backed by notable investors such as Valar Ventures, Fidelity, Akuna Capital, and Coinbase Ventures to name a few.

    What is happening to BlockFi?

    Since 11th November 2022, BlockFi has paused its client withdrawals due to “lack of clarity” in the status of FTX.com, FTX US, and Alameda. Wire withdrawals and loan processing have also been delayed since 10th November 2022 but are expected to resume on 14th November 2022. When BlockFi users access the website, there is a banner warning them that client withdrawals have been paused. BlockFi also reminds users not to make deposits to the BlockFi Wallet or Interest Accounts for the time being.

    BlockFi suspends withdrawals
    BlockFi suspends withdrawals

    What is happening to BlockFi cards?

    BlockFi’s BlockFi Rewards Visa Signature Card was one of the first cryptocurrency rewards credit cards in the market. The BlockFi card’s major benefits include 1.5% crypto rewards on every single purchase, which can go up to 10% for spending with BlockFi’s partners.

    However, there have been people reporting that purchasing privileges on the BlockFi card have been suspended “until further notice”. This means that cardholders can no longer make purchases using the BlockFi card.

    BlockFi card services have been suspended

    This development stems from the fact that payments company Curve is in active negotiations with BlockFi to acquire their over 87,000 credit card customers. According to reports, if the negotiation is successful, Curve will take over the BlockFi card program, and aim for customers to still be able to earn crypto rewards as they did before.

    Is BlockFi in trouble?

    In June 2022, FTX US had extended a US$400 million line of credit to BlockFi with an option for FTX us to acquire BlockFi for a variable price of up to US$240 million. However, the collapse and bankruptcy of FTX have put the future of BlockFi in question for some. This is compounded by the fact that California’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) said on 11th November 2022 that they were suspending BlockFi’s lending license for 30 days. During this suspension, the DFPI will be conducting investigations into BlockFi.

    BlockFi has also admitted in its latest update that it had “significant exposure” to FTX and their associated companies. However, they deny they had a majority of funds held at FTX. To learn more, check out our article- Were BlockFi’s assets held on FTX?

    BlockFi files for bankruptcy

    On 28th November 2022, BlockFi announced it had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States. This latest development comes after speculation has already been brewing in the past few weeks that it was affected by the collapse of FTX exchange. The bankruptcy will include Blockfi and 8 of its subsidiaries.

    According to Court documents, BlockFi has over 100,000 creditors. The company has both assets and liabilities in the range of US$1-10 billion and US$256.9 million cash on hand.

    Therefore, the future of BlockFi is still uncertain, and there is fear that it may go bankrupt like the FTX Group. However, there is currently no official announcement or news that BlockFi will be filing for bankruptcy.

    How much does FTX owe BlockFi and vice versa?

    During BlockFi’s bankruptcy hearing, the company revealed it has US$355 million stuck on FTX. Further, Alameda Research, an associated company of FTX, has defaulted on its US$680 million loan from BlockFi.

    On 28th November 2022, BlockFi had also sued Emergent Fidelity Technologies, a company owned by FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried. The purpose of the lawsuit was to seek SBF’s shares in Robinhood that were used as collateral as part of a pledge agreement.

    On the other hand, on 1st July 2022, FTX US extended a US$400 million line of credit to BlockFi. Of this, BlockFi still owes FTX US US$275 million as allegedly agreed to by 89% of its shareholders. The purpose of the loan was to help BlockFi after it was affected by the collapse of Terra’s stablecoin in May this year. The loan was originally set to mature on 30th June 2027 and had an interest rate of 5% per annum.

    What will happen to BlockFi?

    On 28th November 2022, BlockFi had its first bankruptcy hearing. During this hearing, BlockFi expressed that it will intend to seek the Court’s approval to restore withdrawals for BlockFi wallet holders. However, no formal application has been made yet and the Court has not made a decision on whether withdrawals will be reopened to customers.

    BlockFi’s next bankruptcy hearing is presently scheduled for 9th January 2023 at 10:00 EST.

  • Proof-of-Reserves Explained: Essential for Crypto Exchanges

    Proof-of-Reserves Explained: Essential for Crypto Exchanges

    In light of the FTX collapse, cryptocurrency exchanges are implementing proof-of-reserves (PoR) as a form of on-chain accounting that shows their entire holdings and customers’ assets. As centralized entities, this is a big step towards a more transparent crypto ecosystem, but some argue it might not be enough to regain investor trust. In this article, we will explain how PoR works and why it matters.

    What is Proof-of-Reserves (PoR)?

    Proof-of-reserves (PoR) is a cryptographic method to verify that an exchange has enough assets to cover all customers’ deposits. In doing so, the exchange ensures customers they have sufficient liquidity on hand to process all withdrawals, should a bank run occur.

    This came to light after FTX secretly used $10 billion of customer funds to prop up its sister company Alameda Research, which ultimately led to a liquidity crunch amidst mass withdrawals.

    This has left the crypto community wondering what other crypto exchanges might be doing with customer assets. As a result, Binance CEO Chengpeng Zhao (CZ) urged all crypto exchanges to do PoR, albeit Kraken was one of the first exchanges to prove their reserves in February 2022.

    How Does Proof-of-Reserves Work?

    Proof-of-reserves essentially involves taking a snapshot of all balances held on the exchange which are aggregated into a Merkle tree — a data structure designed to encapsulate and encrypt data. These Merkle trees, also known as hash trees, function as a map of the exchanges’ assets and liabilities (customers’ tokens).

    From there, a Merkle root is obtained, which is a cryptographic fingerprint that uniquely identifies the combination of these balances at the time when the snapshot was taken. Afterwards, digital signatures produced by the exchange are collected, which prove ownership over the on-chain addresses with publicly verifiable balances. To put it simply, the exchange discloses these addresses and provides proof that they have access to the associated private key.

    Because Merkle trees are part of blockchain technology, anyone can compare and verify if these balances exceed or match the customers’ balances represented in the Merkle tree. In the case of crypto exchanges, this process is either self-attested by the exchange or carried out by an independent third-party audit. As of now, most crypto exchanges have been working with Nansen, a blockchain analytics platform, for their PoR audit.

    Downsides of Proof-of-Reserves

    Although proof-of-reserves is certainly a step in the right direction, there are still several improvements that could be made to enhance transparency and trust.

    Proof-of-Reserves are Pointless without Proof of Liabilities

    A proof-of-reserve audit without disclosure of total liabilities, not just customers’ tokens, does not paint a full picture of an exchange’s solvency. This would include anything the exchange owes such as debts and taxes. Kraken CEO Jesse Powell expressed that Binance’s PoR is pointless without liabilities. This is also in reference to other platforms publishing their PoR without mentioning any liabilities. He also added that accounts with negative balances must also be included in the sum of total liabilities.

    However, the problem is that these liabilities are NOT on-chain, which means an independent auditor has to step in. At that point, crypto exchanges will have to provide the same proof as all public and regulated companies provide — audited financial statements. (Clonazepam) Coinbase is one of the few exchanges to do this. Since they are a public company subject to U.S. regulations, they have already been proving their reserves using balance sheets audited by the SEC.

    Therefore, the most reliable way to prove an exchange’s assets are more than its liabilities is via third-party auditors. In fact, CZ responded to Powell’s comments that Binance would involve third-party auditors to audit their PoR results.

    Proof-of-Reserves Audits Can be Falsified

    Although the cryptographic proof do not lie, it can be manipulated and framed to look healthy. There is the issue of crypto exchanges moving their funds right after the snapshot for the audit was taken. Recently, Crypto.com mistakenly transferred 280,000 ETH to a Gate.io address after it released its proof-of-reserves audit. Many speculated that exchanges were borrowing assets to show a healthy balance sheet, only to return them after the snapshot.

    Moreover, a PoR audit is only as good as its verifier. There is also the issue of exchanges colluding with third-party audits to produce false results. Unless the exchange is audited by a reputable source such as the Big Four accounting firms, we will just have to take their word for it.

    Proof-of-Reserves Do Not Prevent Customer Fund Misappropriation

    Even then, audits and attestations may not suffice. At its core, crypto exchanges are not the same as banks — crypto is not insured by government depositary schemes. Even if all the steps are done correctly, customers can still lose their crypto if mishandled.

    Merkle tree-based PoR would not prevent the misappropriation of customer funds completely. It only tracks the money, providing information. It does not provide customers with greater control over their funds. If the exchange is caught in the act, you would not be able to get your crypto back as it is likely to be tied up in litigation.

    Not your keys, not your crypto. We strongly suggest keeping your crypto on hardware wallets such as Ledger Nano X, Ledger Nano S Plus, Ledger Nano S, Trezor One or Trezor Model T.

    Why Proof-of-Reserves is Crucial

    At the end of the day, proof-of-reserves is the first step towards a more transparent crypto ecosystem. In effect, it functions as a verification tool to filter out fraudulent crypto exchanges, albeit not completely.

    By leveraging blockchain technology, PoR brings crypto exchanges closer to the treasuries of DeFi protocols, allowing anyone to trace funds on-chain at any time. However, there is much to improve in this aspect. But with on-demand, real-time tracking of exchange reserves, the industry is working towards a decentralized and trustless system, where customers do not need to trust the institution, only the math.